On Antonio Bryant

Last week Buccaneers Head Coach Raheem Morris announced that the team would not be resigning Antonio Bryant. I think the phrase he used was that they were "moving on". To me this was a head scratching development. Don't get me wrong, I think the Bucs would have been wise to let Bryant test free agency to see what the market was like and then try to match whatever offer he had. But to basically close the door on his return just didn't make any sense to me. I didn't want to have a knee jerk reaction to that decision so I gave it a few days to try to think it through, but I still can't see a way that this makes sense.

Let me first caveat the rest of my post by saying there are things that go on behind the scenes with any team that nobody ever hears about. There could have been things that Antonio Bryant was doing in the locker room or on the practice field that the powers that be saw as detrimental to the team and or to quarterback Josh Freeman's development. If that were the case then I could accept the decision to let him go a lot better. But being as that I haven't heard any of those things for myself, I can only go with what is readily available and is public knowledge. So first I am going to make the case for bringing him back and second I am going to talk about the state decisions to let him walk.

Just one season ago Bryant was a Pro Bowl player with 83 catches for over 1,200 yards and 7 touchdowns. He brought the big play back to the Tampa Bay offense and he made numerous circus catches. Last year he was hurt and started only 11 games, participating in 13 and his numbers fell off precipitously to 39 catches for 600 yards and 4 touchdowns. But you can't view those numbers in a bubble. Bryant had to adjust to 3 different quarterbacks and two new offensive coordinators. Still with all that he was the best wide receiver statistics wise by 8 catches and and by over 200 yards on the team. His 4 touchdowns weren't great but no other wide receiver had more than 1. In short he was the best option that we had all year when we had to throw the ball at the position.

I know people are going after him for supposedly shutting it down because he missed some games this year with his knee, but one thing to keep in mind is that in every one of the 13 games he participated in last season he had at least one catch. Its a modest statistic but something most of our other wide receivers can't say. Its also apparent that after he came back from resting his knee after the Patriots game, his statistics went up the rest of the year. So whether or not the perception was that the team needed him for the two games he missed, it seems at least from the production that him resting his knee was the right way to go.

Now before the Bucs articulated their reasons for allowing Bryant to go via free agency, the dominating perception was that it had to do with his attitude mostly attributed to some interviews he gave. This is an issue I want to talk about because for me I wasn't upset by some of the things he said and in truth I WANT my best receiver to want and demand the ball. My hard and fast rule is that as long as the guy doesn't throw the quarterback or the head coach under the bus I am good with them expressing frustration about not being a part of the offense. So lets take a look at some things he said.

"It’s not (about) me," Bryant said. "I know there's things I’m capable of doing on the field that can get other people open. We just have to find ways for other people to get me open. There’s a lot of double coverage. It’s to the point where teams don’t respond to other things happening on the field. They just keep rolling that safety over.

"We’ve been able to use that where I just go out and run a deep route and take that safety and then you have (Kellen) Winslow come underneath or (Maurice Stovall) come. So, it works to our benefit to some degree.

"But on a personal level, did I like that? No, because I couldn’t get the ball."

I defy anyone who knows anything about football to find something false about what he said. He was right in that most teams at the end of the season were rolling a safety to him to keep him from making big plays. He was also correct that by him running deep routes he was opening things up for guys like Kellen Winslow and Maurice Stovall underneath. And maybe the best part of this whole quote in my opinion is that he said he didn't like it because he wasn't getting the ball.

You show me a guy who is happy being a decoy and I'll show you a loser. The best football players want to contribute and make plays to help their team win. I don't care if its Jerry Rice or Randy Moss or Larry Fitzgerald. None of those guys are happy just opening things up for other people.

Bryant acknowledged his early-season knee injury, one that limited him through the first half of the season and caused him to miss three games. That, too, limited his effectiveness and will, perhaps, make his market value hard to determine. He has 37 catches for 585 yards in 12 games, this after tallying 1,248 yards in 2008 when he was the focal point of coach Jon Gruden's offense.

Not that Bryant is obsessing over it.

"I’m not worried about (teams) judging me," he said. "If it’s not one thing it’s another. It’s 'Oh, he has an attitude. Oh, he has baggage.' Okay, now you don’t see that. Now, what is it? Man, turn on the film and let it play."

So in this instance not only does Bryant run from his injury, he in the words of the Stephen Holder acknowledged that it limited his effectiveness. Again, what did he say that wasn't true? We should be concerned because he is confident in his abilities? I don't think so.

Here is the final part of that post and the section I think a lot of fans got upset about.

As mentioned above, Bryant was far more effective last season. And that was in no small part a result of Gruden's efforts to feature him.

"Most definitely," Bryant said. "I think in the Carolina game (in December 2008), I caught every ball that was thrown to me that night. I probably missed one. The difference between this year and last year, is we (practiced) that stuff every day. Before I went out there on the field, I knew exactly what (Panthers CB) Ken Lucas was going to do. As soon as he touched me, I almost knocked him over because I knew. I told my coach on the sideline excactly what he was going to do. And as soon as he put his hand out, I did it and ran.

"The ball was under thrown, but he was beat so bad. We have situations where you have your guys you want to get the ball to and I’m not on that sheet right now. The tight end is the quarterback’s best friend. They’re committed to Kellen. But that commitment is not helping me. I know how everything operates so I’m just going to be a team guy and do my part."

The one thing about articles like this one that I don't like is that the author never lets you know what question Bryant is responding to. Look at Bryant's quote. Its obvious that he didn't just start talking off the top of his head, but was responding to someone's question. What that question was I guess we will never know.

But look at the quote in its totality. First Bryant talks about his performance in the Carolina game in 2008 and that was a truly magnificent game for him. He then goes on to contrast that with how the game plan goes this year. Was he wrong in saying that the offensive guys were more prepared in 2008 than they were last season? From what I saw during the games he wasn't. Maybe he shouldn't have come out and admitted that they were less prepared this year so as to protect offensive coordinator Greg Olsen, but I personally didn't think he said anything that was that bad in that regard.

The other thing he points out is that he wasn't the focal point in the game plans this season, even when he was healthy. Its on this point I think some fans may not understand what he meant. A lot of people think that you call an offensive play and then the quarterback just drops back and throws to the guy whose open. If only that were really the case. The truth of the matter is that on every passing play there is a primary option, a guy who the offensive coordinator wants the ball to go to based on the coverage the opposing defense plays. At times of course the defense switches up on defense or their guy just covers our guy and the quarterback has to go to a second or third option. But what Bryant seems to be saying here is that more often than not he wasn't the primary option on passing plays. If that was the case, and again watching the games it seemed that he was correct, then why WOULDN'T he speak out about it. I love the things that Winslow can do in our offense and the way he creates mismatches with the opposing defenses, but you can't have a tight end be your primary option on the majority of your passing plays.

Bigger than that wide receivers have a tendency to play better when you get them involved early in the game. When you have a guy like Bryant who is head and shoulders above the rest of the receivers on your team, you feed that guy to not only help him but also to help your quarterback get a rapport with him so they can both have big games. I'm not suggesting you force the ball to Bryant and risk throwing a pick, but there are more than enough "safe" routes to get the ball in his hands early and often. Even if Bryant had never come out and said it, that still would have been one of my criticisms of the offense last year. Aside from the times when Freeman scrambled and threw the ball on the run, our passing game didn't function well because there never seemed to be a method to the madness.

I could see if this only happened a few times throughout the year but instead it was an every game occurrence. Let me put it to you this way, the most catches Bryant had in any one game last year was 5 and he did that 3 times. If he is your number one receiver, and he was, that is almost inexcusable. There has to be a way that at least in one game you get that guy 7 or 8 catches. I don't care if its on wide receiver screens or smoke routes or quick slants. Some how some way if you want to be successful your top wide receiver need to touch the ball more than 5 times in a game.

As for the Buccaneers they have given two reasons as far as I can tell so far for their decision to allow Bryant to go. The first is that they want to get younger on offense, something that sounds kind of laughable when you think about it. So lets think about it.

The starting backfield at the end of the season of Cadillac Williams and Earnest Graham are going into their 6th and 7th NFL seasons respectively. The quarterback is coming off his rookie season. Winslow is going into his 7th season. Every guy on the offensive line except for center Jeff Faine has played 4 or fewer seasons in the NFL. Faine is the old head of everybody heading into his 8th seasons. How young, exactly, are we supposed to be trying to get here?

Keep in mind that as far as the other receivers go we already have some young guys in Sammie Stroughter and Maurice Stovall. Is Antonio Bryant who is going into his 8th year like Faine REALLY supposed to be "too old" to play with this offense? Especially when you look at some wide receivers in this league playing at a high level well into their 30s? I'm not buying that.

The other reason as far as I can tell is that Bryant didn't run crisp enough routes and caused interceptions. Now this goes back to my post on Roy Miller. The NFL can be a dirty game. Folks will look at you cross eyed if you say you can't play because you are injured, but then when you go out and play through the pain they give you no benefit of the doubt when you don't play up to the highest of levels.

Do I believe Bryant didn't run as crisp routes last season as he did in 08? Yes. Do I think its probably because he had knee surgery in the preseason and tried to play through the pain? OF COURSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

But the shady part of that knock on him is where they say he "caused" interceptions. I'm calling bullshit on that. First off all you never, not one time, heard that criticism during the season. As a matter of fact during the season what you did hear was the coaching staff getting on Freeman about his decision making and his accuracy. Now considering how much they wanted and needed for Freeman to be the star going into next year, are you really going to try to convince me that they heaped criticism on him that should have been directed and Antonio Bryant?

Hell to the nawl!

Once again, not buying it.

So what do we have left? We have a receiver who can block but can't catch a cold but naked in the north pole. We have a kid coming off his rookie season who was productive but who will be coming off an injury. We have another guy who may or may not be snatched from us in free agency who to date has been mostly a special teams player but who has shown some flash over the last couple of years. And a bunch of other no name guys who haven't played much in the NFL.

All I can say in closing is this. If we don't get a big name receiver via free agency and or the draft we are going to be in a world of hurt next year. If you thought this year was bad, just wait until our only viable option in the passing game is our tight end. There are a few guys who are trying to get off their current teams like Anquan Boldin and Brandon Marshall who perhaps we could pick up and really bolster or receiver corps, but it doesn't appear that we are leaning in that direction. No matter how much Freeman gets better over the offseason, he won't be able to perform without someone to throw it to. And as it stands we just let our best option walk right out the door for nothing in return.

I hope it works out for the Buccaneer brass, but I just don't see it happening right now.

Ooops

Sorry, I forgot to link my latest Bull Rush post, this time breaking down defensive tackle Roy Miller.

Bull Rush

My latest Bull Rush column is up over at joebucsfan. Today's offering takes a look at Tim Crowder. Check it out and leave a comment!

Another Stat Nobody Is Talking About

The Bucs were abysmal last year and nobody could deny that, but did you know that they lost 4 games by 7 points or less? In fact did you know that if you added up all the points they lost by in those 4 games you would only come up with 15 points, basically an average of a little over a field goal?

I'm sure you probably wouldn't because nobody really talks about that. They are too busy trying to convince you that Coach Raheem Morris is "in over his head".

Now to be sure, even if we won those games we would still be only 7-9, which isn't exactly world beating status. But still when you put it in that context doesn't even the most cynical Bucs fan have to be just a little bit more optimistic about this upcoming season?

I know I am.

Choking The Life Out Of The Zombie Talking Point

This evening I had a pretty spirited debate with a Buccaneer fan over on the joebucsfan site about the direction of the Bucs. In the course of this back and forth this particular fan repeated the now familiar tripe about the Bucs not REALLY improving all that much in the last 6 games because they were just playing teams that "didn't have anything to play for". Well I left a comment about that which on reflection probably deserves its own post so here it goes.

Not sure how you think I am cherry picking over the last six games, but since this talking point won’t die let me break it down for you and everybody else.

The Bucs played two playoff teams out of the last six games and played one team twice that ended up with a winning record. When the Bucs played the Falcons the first time, the Panthers, and the Jets, all three were still trying to get into the playoffs. When we played the Saints they were angling for a number 1 seeding. So thats 4 out of the 6 games where the teams all DID have something to play for. The second game with the Falcons they were trying to do something that had never been done in their franchises history. Back to back winning seasons. So that makes 5 out of 6 games. Now the Seahawks sucked ass most of the year so yeah I guess you can write that one off, but I watched the game and I didn’t see them lay down for us. Hell they were WINNING at half time.

As for improvement, understand that I didn’t say we became the Steel Curtain or the Purple People Eaters. I said we improved. And as Jay Z said recently, men lie, women lie, numbers don’t.

In the last 6 games we got 7 picks, 11 sacks and 5 forced fumbles. Our opponents scoring average went down substantially to around 18 pts per for those 6 games. We held the superbowl champs to 17 points which is the same as what the Cowboys held them to the week prior.

Again, still not the old Ravens defense, but how can you look at that evidence and still not admit that they improved in a major way? I understand that there are some folks who are in the media in this area who have tried to poo poo the improvement but mostly thats because nobody ever challenged them on the substance of their argument. If somebody did challenge them most of them would fall on their face.

I root for the Bucs on Sunday from my heart but I blog about them from my head. It is what it is.

I am smart enough to realize that some Bucs fans have already heard this so many times that they won't be dissuaded about it, but at least if they read this post they won't be able to say that nobody ever told them the truth.

Real talk.

On The Bucs Drafting Eric Berry At Number 3

As I hear the draftniks going into full swing since the NFL season is now officially over I have heard a lot of chatter about who the Buccaneers should pick at #3. Now I know one guy threw a total curveball saying the Bucs would take USF defensive end Jason Paul-Pierre, but that is pretty much unfathomable. In fact, while I like JPP's potential I personally would say the whole scouting department should be fired if they draft him that high. He had a pretty good year this year, but he had only one year as a starter. And while he was good you couldn't make the argument that he was dominant without getting laughed out of the room. I think if there is an established team out there that doesn't have a lot of teams (they are usually towards the bottom of the first round because of their success) then perhaps you can get a guy like JPP as a project for a few years down the road. But the Bucs need a guy who can contribute right away. A homerun so to speak.

That brings me to the guy I have said they should pick all along and that is Eric Berry. Now I know the hype behind Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy is such that they would HAVE to draft one of those guys if they fell to them. I get that much. But if not I think Berry is overwhelmingly the logical choice. He would fill an area of need. He would give us a very dynamic safety tandem with Tanard Jackson. And he is so versatile that he could begin the transition of Ronde Barber retiring by taking over some of his duties as a nickel blitzer.

The thing of it is, I haven't really heard anyone, not one single person, argue that Berry isn't talented enough to be taken at #3. The knock seems to always be that Saftey is a position that just isn't traditionally drafed that high. And you know what, they are right! But I wanted to do a thought experiment for those fans who believe that just because it isn't traditionally done, that we shouldn't do it.

Here are a couple of lists I want you to check out and then I will explain afterwards.

1. Charles Rogers, Dewayne Robertson, Byron Leftwich, Michael Haynes, and Jerome McDougle.

2. David Carr, Joey Harrington, Mike Williams, Wendell Bryant, William Green, Phillip Buchannan, TJ Duckett, Ashley Lelie, Javon Walker.

3. Robert Gallery, DeAngelo Hall, Reggie Williams, Michael Clayton, J.P. Losman, Marcus Tubbs, Chris Perry, Kevin Jones, Rashaun Woods, Teddy Lehman.


The first list is guys drafted before Troy Palomalu, the second list is guys drafted before Ed Reed, and the third list is guys drafted before Bob Sanders.

Now I know all three have had some injury issues during their career, but 2 out of the 3 have been voted Defensive Player of the Year, and 2 of the 3 have won a Superbowl. Now ask yourself a question, do you really believe the GMs for the teams that drafted before they were taken wouldn't go back now and pick them instead?

I know that hindsight is 20/20 but by all accounts Eric Berry looks to be in the same class of athlete as all three of those guys. If he runs a good time which at this point I would think would be the only question left, I really can't see how drafting him at 3 would be a bad move.

Now there are no guarantees in life, and definitely not in the NFL draft, but I have seen enough to convince me that Eric Berry would be a solid pick at #3. It is what it is.

Bull Rush

My latest edition of Bull Rush is up over at joebucsfan. This time I profile defensive tackle Ryan Sims. Check it out and let me know what you think.